Loading page...
Vindex builds intake and coordination systems for law firms. Practice pages below match how personal injury, family, estate planning, immigration, and business matters actually run. Advice, conflicts, and filings stay with your attorneys.
Law firms lose retainers between first contact and a prepared engagement. The leak looks different by practice area, so each practice has its own page. This hub covers the firm-wide coordination layer and routes you to the right practice page. Vindex does not practice law.
Vindex may support preparation, coordination, collection, routing, reminders, and administrative follow-through. Vindex does not replace legal, accounting, investment, or other regulated professional judgment. Your qualified professionals keep control of advice, conclusions, filings, conflicts, recommendations, and high-stakes client communications.
Conflict checks are prepared for attorney decision. The system never clears a conflict on its own. Engagement terms and legal strategy stay with the firm.
Each practice page has its own qualification questions, urgency rules, document lists, and what "signed matter" means.
These are operating signals to investigate, not promises that every business needs the same system.
One generic intake script treats every practice the same and books poor-fit consults.
After-hours inquiries die while counsel is in hearings or trial prep.
Document chasing and engagement follow-up still sit on paralegals with no baseline measure.
Partners cannot see inquiry-to-signed-matter conversion by practice.
Firm-wide example workflows that apply across practices. Practice pages add the intake and matter patterns unique to each area. Labeled as examples, not client results.
A new inquiry or matter name needs a conflict review.
Assembles parties and related names from intake into your conflict workflow and notifies the responsible attorney that a check is ready.
Only an attorney decides clearance, waivers, or decline.
Time from inquiry to conflict decision; incomplete conflict packet rate.
The firm decides to engage.
Fills the approved template fields, routes for attorney approval, sends e-sign, and follows up until signed or escalated.
Attorney approves the engagement terms before send.
Days from verbal yes to signed engagement; stalled engagement count.
A status cadence you define, or a milestone event.
Drafts a plain-language update from matter fields and queues it for attorney or case-manager approval before the client sees it.
No client status message sends without the human approval rule you set.
On-time client update rate; partner time spent writing routine status notes.
Weekly or monthly operating review.
Reports inquiry volume, response times, consults held, engagements signed, and drop-off points by practice when your systems support it.
Managing partner interprets the numbers and decides resourcing.
Inquiry-to-signed-matter conversion; time in each stage.
We narrow the problem before we build, then keep the system accountable after launch.
We learn how the business runs, find the workflow leaking the most revenue or owner time, and say honestly whether a build is a fit.
On a second call we show the workflow to fix first, what it is likely costing (assumptions shown), what we will build, the measure it should move, and a fixed price for the 6-Week AI Transformation.
In six weeks we map the workflow, build the fix inside the tools your company already uses, train your team, and have it live within 30 days when the approved scope supports it. You own the system. We measure the result against a baseline.
After the six weeks, optional care keeps the delivered system reliable and aligned with the original business result.
Software, telephony, data, and usage costs are separate client expenses unless a proposal states otherwise. Pricing is discussed on the calls, not on this website.
A custom underwriting agent and QA path saves about 4 to 5 hours of underwriting time per day for the principal, with deterministic calculations and a review gate before the report posts to the opportunity.
This shows how Vindex removes preparation and coordination load in knowledge work while keeping human control on the decision. It is not a law-firm result and not a claim about any attorney practice area.
The useful answer depends on your workflow, systems, controls, and team. These are the starting boundaries.
Qualification questions, urgency rules, document lists, and what "signed matter" means differ by practice. Separate pages keep the promise and the workflows honest.
No. It supports coordination and preparation. Legal judgment stays with licensed attorneys at your firm.
No. It can prepare the packet and route it. Only your attorneys clear, waive, or decline.
One repeated workflow in one practice with a clear baseline. We do not boil the ocean in week one.
No. Matter content is not marketing inventory. Any case study needs separate written permission.
Bring the repeated work that is slowing the team down. We will map the decision, the controls, and the measure that matters.
Book an AI Strategy Call